Rev Bras Fisiol Exerc 2022;21(3):172-83
doi: 10.33233/rbfex.v21i3.5163
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on physical performance of
runners
Efeitos da
suplementação de bicarbonato de sódio sobre a performance física de corredores
de rua
Ryan Oliveira de Menezes1,
Isis Emanuelle Lima de Santana1, Raquel de Jesus Silva1,
João Henrique Gomes1, Renata Rebello Mendes1
1Universidade
Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil
Received: May 2, 2022; Accepted:
June 22, 2022.
Correspondence: Renata Rebello Mendes, Universidade
Federal de Sergipe, Departamento de Nutrição (DNUT), Av. Marechal Rondon, s/n
Jardim Rosa Elze 49100-000 São Cristóvão SE
Ryan
Oliveira de Menezes: ryanmenezes@academico.ufs.br
Isis
Emanuelle Lima de Santana: isislima@academico.ufs.br
Raquel de
Jesus Silva: raqueljs@live.com
João
Henrique Gomes: profjhgomes@gmail.com
Renata
Rebello Mendes: remendes@academico.ufs.br
Abstract
Introduction: Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)
supplementation has been shown to reduce metabolic acidosis, and to optimize
performance in predominantly anaerobic exercises. However, its effects on
aerobic exercise remain inconclusive. Objective: This study aimed to
evaluate the effects of NaHCO3 supplementation on metabolic
acidosis, exercise performance and body composition in 5-km tracking runners.
14 runners were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (PLA = 7;
maltodextrin, 2x5 gday-1 for 27 days, and a dose of 0.3 g/kg
administered on the 28th day, 60 minutes before the performance
test) or NaHCO3 (BIC = 7; maltodextrin, for 22 days; 2x5 gday-1
of NaHCO3 for five days, and a maximum dose (0.3 g/kg) administered
on the 28th day before the performance test. The exercise performance was
assessed before (PRE) and after (POST) supplementation, through a test
consisting of 25 minutes running at 85% of maximal heart rate, followed by
running to exhaustion, at 110% of the speed obtained in incremental test.
Metabolic acidosis was assessed by urinary anion gap at before and after the
intervention. Results: The mean time to exhaustion was 93.6 ± 21.2 and
82.6 ± 18.2 in PRE, and 130.3 ± 35.2 and 92.8 ± 17.0 seconds in POST (BIC and
PLA, respectively). At rest, urinary anion gap was positive in both groups, in
PRE and POST. After exercise, the means in the PRE were -26,2 ± 8,2 and -26,1 ±
3,7, and POST -14,9 ± 14,6 and -27,7 ± 4,0 mEq/L (BIC
and PLA respectively). There was a negative correlation (-0.78) between
metabolic acidosis and time to exhaustion. Conclusion: The study showed that
sodium bicarbonate supplementation promoted performance improvement and urinary
anion gap alteration in tracking runners submitted to the exhaustion test.
Keywords: running; sodium bicarbonate; acidosis; dietary
supplements.
Resumo
Introdução: A suplementação com bicarbonato de
sódio (NaHCO3) tem demonstrado reduzir acidose metabólica e otimizar a
performance em exercícios predominantemente anaeróbios; porém, seus efeitos
sobre exercícios majoritariamente aeróbios são inconclusivos. Objetivo:
Avaliar efeitos da suplementação de NaHCO3 sobre performance e acidose
metabólica de corredores de rua (5 km). Métodos: 14 corredores foram
randomicamente distribuídos em grupo placebo (PLA = 7; 2 doses de 5 g/dia por
27 dias, e uma dose de 0,3 g/kg no 28o dia, 60 minutos antes do
teste de performance) ou NaHCO3 (BIC = 7; placebo durante 22 dias, e
cinco dias de NaHCO3: 2 doses de 5 g/dia; no 28o dia, 0,3
g/kg, 60 minutos antes do teste. O teste de performance antes (PRE) e após
(POS) a suplementação consistiu em 25 minutos de corrida a 85% da frequência
cardíaca máxima, seguidos de teste de exaustão, a 110% da velocidade máxima
atingida em teste incremental. Acidose metabólica foi avaliada por ânion gap
urinário. Resultados: O tempo até exaustão foi 93,6 ± 21,2 e 82.6 ± 18.2
no PRE, e 130,3 ± 35,2 e 92,8 ± 17,0 seg no POS (BIC e
PLA, respectivamente). Em repouso, o anion gap
urinário foi positivo nos dois grupos, no PRE e POS; após exercício, as médias
obtidas no PRE foram -26,2 ± 8,2 e -26,1 ± 3,7, e no POS, -14,9 ± 14,6 e -27,7
± 4,0 mEq/L (BIC e PLA, respectivamente). Houve correlação
negativa forte entre performance e acidose metabólica (r = 0,78; p = 0,01). Conclusão:
O estudo mostrou que a suplementação de bicarbonato de sódio promoveu melhora
na performance e alteração de anion gap urinário de
corredores de rua submetidos à teste de exaustão.
Palavras-chave: corrida; bicarbonato de sódio; acidose
metabólica; suplementação alimentar.
The number of runners has increased significantly in
recent years, which has improved the number of running events in the world,
especially those of shorter duration, such as the five to ten kilometers (5 km
to 10 km). In the United States, the 5 km races took 1st place in the ranking
in the years 2018 and 2019, reaching an amount of 29 thousand races [1]. In
Brazil, the same trend is observed [2,3].
Runs of up to 10 km use around 80% of aerobic
metabolism for energy supply, leaving 15% and 5% for lactic and alactic anaerobic metabolism, respectively [4]. Although
the main reason for the search for 5 km races is to improve the quality of life
[3], inevitably, practitioners started to worry about their performance in the
tests, seeking to avoid fatigue, that is, a drop in motor performance induced
by exercise, as well as feeling tired and weak [5].
Among the metabolic factors capable of causing a drop
in performance, metabolic acidosis stands out, capable of inhibiting the
glycolytic pathway activity and impairing several stages of the contractile
process [6]. The increase in acidosis during exercise is related to the
degradation process of the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecule, as well as to
the use of the lactic glycolytic pathway [7]. Therefore, the ingestion of
nutritional supplements has been studied to induce alkalosis as a way of
increasing the chemical buffering capacity, that is, a form of protection for
the organism against metabolic acidosis and, consequently, against the appearance
of fatigue during exercise [8].
Sodium bicarbonate has become one of the most used
supplements for this purpose, having the potential ability to prolong high
performance and maintain optimal performance in various sports practices,
including high-intensity running, and especially practices that demand high
anaerobic metabolism [9,10,11].
Therefore, given the growing number of runners in
Brazil and the scarcity of studies that evaluate the effects of supplementation
with buffering agents on sports performance in events of this nature, the
relevance of the present study is evident, whose objective is to evaluate the
effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on physical performance and
metabolic acidosis in runners.
Experimental design
The present study was carried out in a total of five
visits. On visit 1, clarifications were made regarding the objectives and
methods of the study so that the participants could sign the Free and Informed
Consent Terms (ICF). On the second visit, anthropometric assessment, guidance
for food records, and familiarization with the running test were performed. On
the third visit, three days after the second visit, the Conconi
test was performed. Two days later, the fourth visit was carried out, when the
exhaustion test, urine collection, and delivery of the food record referring to
the day before the test were performed. During 27 days, the participants were
monitored daily by a messaging service application to collect information about
compliance with training sessions, supplementation consumption, and the
possible emergence of side effects. During the same period, training sessions
were monitored through apps or sports watches with a global position system
(GPS). On the fifth visit, the exhaustion test, urine collection, and delivery
of the food record referring to the day before the test was performed (Figure
1).
Figure 1 - Experimental study design
Sample
Fourteen male recreational runners were evaluated,
enrolled in a sports advisory in Aracaju/SE, with a mean age of 35.3 ± 6.8
years; 75.7 ± 11.3 kg; 1.75 ± 0.1 m height; Body Mass Index of 24.7 ± 1.8 kg/m2
and percentage of fat mass of 15.5 ± 5.0%. Sampling was performed for
convenience. To participate in the study, runners had to present: a) weekly
training volume between 25 and 40 km, with an average pace per kilometer
between 4.5 and 6.0 min/km in 5 km events; b) have experience of at least one
year in 5 km events; c) have a positive result in the Physical Activity
Readiness Questionnaire [12] to detect possible contraindications for the
practice of physical activity; d) sign the Term of Responsibility for the State
of Health; e) not consuming ergogenic food supplements in the last 60 days.
As exclusion criteria, the following were considered:
a) absence in 10% of training sessions; b) absence in running tests; c)
consumption of other supplements based on nitrogen compounds; d) and the use of
other resources considered ergogenic.
Supplementation protocol
The 14 participants were divided into two groups:
a) placebo group (PLA): due to the training periodization previously
determined for this group of runners, the interval between assessments was set
at 28 days; thus, the runners in this group received two doses of 5 g/day of unflavored
maltodextrin for 27 days, and on the 28th day they consumed a single dose of
0.3 g/kg 60 minutes before the performance test;
b) sodium bicarbonate group (BIC): this group received a placebo in the
first 22 days, the same as the PLA group; in the following five days (23rd
to 27th days), the BIC group received two doses of 5 g/day of sodium
bicarbonate; and on the 28th day, a single dose of 0.3 g/kg was
administered 60 minutes before the performance test, according to the consensus
of the International Olympic Committee about supplementation for
high-performance athletes [10].
Table I – Characterization of the sample after division
into groups at the beginning of the study - PRE supplementation (mean and
standard deviation)
BIC = Bicarbonate; PLA = Placebo; p-value = unpaired
student's t-test
The supplements were packed in identical packages
(sachets) and delivered weekly to the participants. Upon receiving the sachets,
the participants received verbal and printed instructions on the ingestion
procedures. The supplements were identified through codes unknown to both the
researchers and the research subjects, thus characterizing a double-blind
study.
Sports performance
To evaluate the sports performance, the exhaustion
test on a treadmill was adopted. As a prerequisite for carrying out this test,
it was necessary to know some individual variables of the runners, such as
maximum heart rate (HRmax) and the running speed reached when the maximum heart
rate was reached. Additionally, for the training prescription of the runners over
the 28 days of supplementation, it was necessary to estimate the anaerobic
threshold of each one. Therefore, to identify these three variables, a test
adapted from Conconi [13] was adopted. It is worth
mentioning that the anaerobic threshold was estimated through the heart rate
deflection point.
a) Conconi test adapted for
the treadmill: The incremental running protocol was applied on a treadmill
(R-3500E, Riguetto, Brazil) with a 1.0% incline. The
starting speed was 5.0 km/h, with speed increments of 1 km/h every 60s. The
subjects walked in the first three phases (up to 7 km/h) and continued,
however, running from 8 km/h until maximum voluntary exhaustion. It was defined
as the subject's maximum velocity at half or the last full stage that the subject
could sustain (in 30 or 60 s). During recovery, subjects walked at 5 km/h for
three minutes [14]. Heart rate monitors (Polar Electro, Kempele,
Finland) were used to record heart rate (HR) continuously throughout the test.
b) Exhaustion test: After the 48-hour interval of the Conconi test, the exhaustion test protocol was applied on
the treadmill with a 1.0% incline. The objective of the test was to simulate
five km races, including their characteristic final sprint. Thus, the
exhaustion test consisted of two stages:
First stage: 30 minutes, divided into a warm-up, in
which the starting speed was 5.0 km/h, with increments between 1 to 2 km/h
every 60 s to reach, in the first five minutes, the speed corresponding to 85%
of the HRmax obtained in the Conconi test; and
continuous running of 25 minutes, maintaining the intensity of 85% of the HRmax
of the runner. In addition to the HR, the intensity of the effort was monitored
through the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale every 5 min [15].
Second stage: “All out” moment (exhaustion test) in
which the subject ran at 110% of the maximum speed corresponding to the HRmax
obtained in the Conconi test. There was no interval
between one stage and another, the speed was gradually increased, and the
timers started as soon as the target speed was reached. Heart rate was assessed
before the tests, at the end of the warm-up, and after that, minute by minute
until exhaustion, using a heart rate monitor.
Both performance tests were performed in a gym, and
all runners had previous experience with treadmill running and running tests.
The time of performance of each test was standardized by runner, remaining the
same in the pre and post-supplementation periods.
Metabolic acidosis: As an indicator of metabolic
acidosis, the urinary anion gap was adopted, which consists of the difference
between cations and anions present in human urine. The values are determined
from the urinary concentrations of chlorine, potassium and sodium, through the
following equation: Urinary anion gap = (Na+ +K+) - Cl-
[16].
For that, urine samples (minimum of 30 mL) were
collected in the performance tests in the following moments: a) rest
(pre-test), b) exhaustion (post-test), in the PRE, and in the POST supplementation.
The samples were stored at 4ºC and transported on ice
to a private laboratory, and the analyzes were performed by the selective
electrode method. Negative urinary anion gap values were considered indicators
of metabolic acidosis [17].
Body Composition: To calculate the percentage of fat,
the Jackson and Pollock 7-fold equation for men aged 18 to 61 years was used,
defined by: [1.112 - 0.00043499 x (Σ7
folds) + 0.00000055 x (Σ7
folds)2 - 0.00028826 x (age)].
Assessment of side effects: the subjects were
instructed to notify the research team of any symptoms, describing the affected
body part, the moment when the effect appeared, and how long it took for it to
appear and disappear.
Standards: food intake and training
Food intake: Individuals were given 24-hour food
record sheets to be filled out the day before the PRE and POST supplementation
tests, which should be returned and filled in according to the instructions
initially offered. Participants were instructed to maintain the dietary pattern
throughout the experiment, especially the day before and on the test days. To
this end, the subjects received copies of the food records completed in the
pre-supplementation period for trying to follow the initial dietary pattern.
For the analysis of data from food records, the software Avanutri
version 3.0 was used.
Training: During the 28-day interval between the first
and second exhaustion tests, the participants followed training prescriptions
planned by the responsible physical educator.
The training was performed four times a week (on
alternate days), with equalization of the total distance to be covered.
Subjects trained in parks and flat terrain racetracks. The total distances
covered for each week were: week 1 = 30 km, week 2 = 33 km, week 3 = 36 km and
week 4 = 30 km. The intensity of the runs was individually prescribed according
to the anaerobic threshold obtained through the Conconi
test. Two training sessions were prescribed using the continuous method and two
sessions of the interval method. To accurately monitor the training, the
subjects reported at the end of each session a race report obtained through
applications or sports watches with a global position system (GPS).
During the investigation, runners were asked not to
perform any “extra” physical exercise (not provided for in the prescription
worksheet) to avoid possible interference in the final performance result.
Statistical treatment
The Shapiro-Wilk and Levene
tests verified the normality and homogeneity of the data, respectively.
Unpaired student's t-test was used to verify the difference between the groups
for age and height. 2x2 ANOVA (group interaction [BIC x PLA] × time [moments])
followed by Tukey's post hoc tests determined the differences between the
groups. All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS software - version
21.0. The significance adopted was p ≤ 0.05. Pearson's linear correlation
was used in the association between performance and urinary anion gap. The
magnitude of the correlation followed the classification: r = 0.10 to 0.30
(weak), r = 0.40 to 0.60 (moderate) and r = 0.70 to 1.00 (strong), according to
Dancey and Reidy [18].
Ethical aspects
The study was initiated after approval by the Research
Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe (CAE
54233616.1.0000.5546, approval report number 1,486,265).
Table II shows that, in terms of performance in the
exhaustion test, there was no difference between the BIC and PLA groups at the
pre-supplementation moment; however, after this intervention, the performance
of the BIC group was significantly superior to the PLA group, as well as
superior to the BIC group itself at the pre-supplementation moment.
Also, in table II, it is noted that both groups
entered into metabolic acidosis (negative anion gap) after exercise, both pre and post-supplementation, with differences (p < 0.05)
between the moments of rest and post-exertion. However, there is a significant
difference between the BIC and PLA groups at the time post-supplementation
after the effort.
It is worth mentioning that the HRmax of the PLA group
was significantly lower than the BIC group at the pre-supplementation moment.
However, this difference did not appear after the intervention (Table II).
Table II – Physiological and physical performance variables
of runners in the PRE and POST assessments (mean and standard deviation)
BIC = Bicarbonate; PLA = Placebo; HRmax = Maximum
Heart Rate; Bpm = beats per minute; p-value = 2x2 ANOVA; Tukey's post hoc; PRE
= pre-supplementation; POST = after supplementation. *Significant difference (p
≤ 0.05) between PRE and POST assessments (Intragroup); #Significant
difference (p ≤ 0.05) between rest and post-exertion; aSignificant
difference (p ≤ 0.05) between BIC and PLA in the PRE assessment; bSignificant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between
BIC and PLA in the POST assessment
Figure 2 shows that the lower the metabolic acidosis
(negative anion gap), the longer the time to exhaustion (performance) of
runners, thus showing the strong and negative correlation between such
variables (r = -0.78; p = 0.01).
Pearson's linear correlation; PRE =
pre-supplementation; POST = after supplementation.
Figure 2 - Correlation between changes in performance in
the exhaustion test and acidification (negative anion gap) of urine after
exercise in the evaluation performed after supplementation with sodium
bicarbonate or placebo (n = 14)
Body composition
There was no statistical difference in body weight
between groups and time points (p = 0.867). Both groups showed a significant
reduction in the percentage of fat mass (BIC reduction from 16.0 ± 6.1 to 14.2
± 5.9; p = 0.034 and PLA reduction from 14.9 ± 6.2 to 12.5 ± 4.7; p = 0.004);
however, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.266). Just as both groups
had a significant increase in lean mass percentage (BIC change from 84.0 ± 6.1
to 85.8 ± 5.9%; p = 0.033 and PLA change from 85.1 ± 6.0 to 87.5 ± 4.6%; p =
0.004); however, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.671).
Caloric intake
There was no significant difference in energy
consumption between groups and moments (BIC pre: 2689.46 ± 511.82 kcal and BIC
post: 2350.33 ± 352.98 kcal; PLA pre 3308.33 ± 1255.48 kcal and PLA post: 2572
.51 ± 1057.69 kcal).
Side effects related to sodium bicarbonate
The presence of gastrointestinal discomforts, such as
mild gastric pain and flatulence, was detected in 50% of the participants. Such
effects were observed only on the day the maximum dose of sodium bicarbonate
was offered, being triggered minutes after the end of the exhaustion test.
The findings of the present study showed that only the
sodium bicarbonate group showed a significant improvement in performance in the
exhaustion test, as well as this group was able to alleviate the metabolic
acidosis observed after physical exertion.
It is believed that the positive effect of sodium
bicarbonate supplementation on performance, observed in the present study, is a
consequence of the better control of metabolic acidosis, suggested by the
urinary anion gap. According to Kellum [17], in non-ill individuals, the
urinary anion gap has a positive value or close to zero; however, in metabolic
acidosis, there is a significant increase in ammonia (NH4+) and
chloride (Cl-) excretion to maintain electro-neutrality, resulting
in negative urinary anion gap values.
Thus, it is noted that before consuming the
supplementation (PRE moment), both groups had anion gap averages considered
normal, that is, positive or close to zero, while at rest, and negative
averages after exercise, indicating that the exhaustion test provoked metabolic
acidosis. After supplementation, sodium bicarbonate did not prevent but
significantly ameliorated metabolic acidosis, which may have caused a
difference in performance in the exhaustion test.
The hypothesis that the performance improvement
observed in this study, after sodium bicarbonate supplementation, is due to
better control of metabolic acidosis and can be reinforced by the strong and
negative correlation between time to exhaustion and urinary anion gap at the
time after supplementation, in agreement with Lancha Junior et al. [19],
which emphasizes the buffering function of this supplement.
During high-intensity exercise, especially in the
final sprint of running events, muscle work usually occurs above the anaerobic
threshold, associated with a large production of lactic acid and, consequently,
the release of H+ and carbon dioxide, which are accumulated in
muscle and blood. In this situation, sodium bicarbonate will drain H+
ions from the muscle to the blood, decreasing muscle acidosis and providing an
improvement in the athlete's performance [11].
It is worth mentioning that the exhaustion test
adopted in the present study is characterized as high-intensity, simulating a
final sprint of a race, and that, therefore, it is capable of generating a
significantly high release of H+, which may benefit from a greater
buffering capacity, as suggested by Grgic et al.
[20]. It is worth mentioning that the use of the treadmill as a means of
evaluating performance can be considered a limiting factor, as it is a group of
runners. However, to alleviate this limitation, subjects were familiarized with
the tests on the treadmill, as well as adapted to the slope that simulates
running.
The RPE was used to monitor the possible interventions
between the two moments of performance evaluation in the exhaustion test. There
were no intrapersonal changes in RPE between the pre
and post-supplementation moments, indicating that the runners started the
all-out in the post-supplementation test under the same conditions of physical
exhaustion that started in the pre-supplementation test, reproducing a similar
demand, allowing the evaluation only the effect of supplementation.
The findings of the present investigation are in
agreement with previously published results [21,22,23,24,25]. It was reported by Crivelaro [24], improvement in RPE in 53.3% and a reduction
in fatigue index (FI) in 64.3% of 30 soccer players who received acute
supplementation of 0.3 g/kg of sodium bicarbonate body weight, between 90 and
120 minutes before the tests, and who underwent sprints to simulate events
arising from a match.
Another report shows that the use of 0.3 g/kg of body
weight of sodium bicarbonate in high-intensity and prolonged duration
exercises, with the potential to induce muscle acidosis, is beneficial [21].
In a study by Cameron et al. [23],
supplementation of 0.3 g/kg of body weight 65 minutes before exercise attenuated
the drop in blood pH compared to the placebo group during high-intensity
exercise in well-trained rugby players.
It also demonstrated improvement in the performance of
athletes in athletics, in the 400 and 800 m events, and swimming, in the 100 and
200 m events [22,25], which have similar characteristics to the sprints
performed in the finals of race events.
As for body composition, it
can be observed that both groups showed changes in body composition between pre and post-supplementation moments, with no differences
between them. It is believed that the changes are due to the training routine
since the caloric intake was maintained in both moments of the study. Although
the assessment of changes in body composition was not an objective of the
present study, a possible weight reduction in only one of the groups could
impact the performance of athletes in running [26].
Regarding side effects, some disorders in the
gastrointestinal system have been reported in the literature when doses starting
from 0.4 g/kg of body weight are used [9]. Although doses lower than those
described were used, 50% of the runners had mild side effects when consuming
the maximum dose suggested in the present study (0.3 g/kg body weight).
However, as such effects appeared about two hours after the ingestion and the
exhaustion test was completed before this period, there were no performance
losses.
The study showed that sodium bicarbonate
supplementation promoted performance improvement and urinary anion gap
alteration in runners submitted to the exhaustion test.
Acknowledgments
We thank the runners who participated in the study and
the Clube de Corrida Zona Alvo (Zona Alvo Racing Club) for collaborating with the organization
of the performance testing schedule.
Financing source
No external funding sources for this study.
Potential conflict of interest
No conflict of interest has been reported.
Authors' contribution
Research conception and design: Menezes RO, Mendes RR; Data acquisition: Menezes RO, Santana
IE; Data analysis and interpretation: Menezes RO, Gomes HH, Mendes RR; Statistical
analysis: Gomes JH; Obtaining financing: Menezes RO, Mendes RR; Manuscript
writing: Menezes RO, Silva RJ, Mendes RR; Critical review of the
manuscript for important intellectual content: Mendes RR