Efeitos do cicloergômetro no pós-operatório sobre a capacidade funcional e o tempo de hospitalização em adultos submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca: protocolo de revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v24i3.5362Palavras-chave:
exercício aeróbico, cirurgia cardíaca, período pós-operatórioResumo
Introduction: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, some pulmonary and cardiac complications can be observed, which can increase the length of hospital stay. The cycle ergometer is used to try to improve this clinical scenario. However, some inconsistencies can be observed in the literature. Objective: To synthesize evidence on the effects of cycle ergometer use in the in-hospital postoperative period in relation to control therapy without cycle ergometer use on functional capacity and length of hospital stay in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with patients undergoing cardiac surgery, to evaluate the effects of cycle ergometer use compared to control without cycle ergometer use. Primary outcomes: functional capacity and length of hospital stay. Searches: Medline, EMBASE, PEDro, Pubmed, Allied and AMED, Cinahl, Lilacs, Scielo, Scopus and Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, ReBEC, and the references of included studies. Study selection will be conducted by three authors. The risk of bias will be assessed by two independent authors using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool and conflicts will be resolved through consensus (in the absence of consensus, a third author will make the decision). The inverse variance method and random effects model will be considered in the meta-analysis. Continuous variables will be analyzed by weighted mean difference and dichotomous variables by relative risk (RR). We will use I2 statistics to estimate the amount of heterogeneity between studies. Discussion: Different cardiac surgeries are performed all over the world, and have been widely investigated. However, some gaps and controversies can be observed. Therefore, a systematic review is essential to clarify existing gaps.
Referências
Vervoort D, Meuris B, Meyns B, Verbrugghe P. Global cardiac surgery: Access to cardiac surgical care around the world. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(3):987-996.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.039
Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, Markewitz A, Gummert J. German Heart Surgery Report 2020: The Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69(4):294-307. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730374
DATASUS tabnet [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sept 10]. Available from:: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sih/cnv/qiuf.def
Pahwa S, Bernabei A, Schaff H, Stulak J, Greason K, Pochettino A, et al. Impact of postoperative complications after cardiac surgery on long-term survival. J Card Surg. 2021;36(6):2045-52. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15471
Almashrafi A, Alsabti H, Mukaddirov M, Balan B, Aylin P. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay following cardiac surgery in a major referral hospital in Oman: a retrospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010764. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010764
Pinto AH, Lange C, Pastore CA, Llano PMP, Castro DP, Santos F. Functional capacity to perform activities of daily living among older persons living in rural areas registered in the Family Health Strategy. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2016;21(11):3545-55. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320152111.22182015
Borges JBC, Ferreira DLMP, Carvalho SMR, Martins AS, Andrade RR, Silva MAM. Pain intensity and postoperative functional assessment after heart surgery. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;21(4):393-402. doi: 10.1590/S0102-76382006000400009
Sumin AN, Oleinik PA, Bezdenezhnykh AV, Bezdenezhnykh NA. Factors determining the functional state of cardiac surgery patients with complicated postoperative period. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074329
Santos TD, Pereira SN, Portela LOC, Cardoso DM, Lago PD, Guarda NDS, et al. Moderate-to-high intensity inspiratory muscle training improves the effects of combined training on exercise capacity in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Cardiol. 2019;279:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.013
Busch JC, Lillou D, Wittig G, Bartsch P, Willemsen D, Oldridge N, at al. Resistance and balance training improves functional capacity in very old participants attending cardiac rehabilitation after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2270-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12030
Lordello GGG, Gama GGG, Rosier GL, Viana PADC, Correia LC, Fonteles Ritt LEF. Effects of cycle ergometer use in early mobilization following cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(4):450-59. doi: 10.1177/0269215520901763
Ribeiro BC, Poça JJG, Rocha AMC, Cunha CNS, Cunha KC, Falcão LFM, et al. Different physiotherapy protocols after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 2021;26(1):e1882. doi: 10.1002/pri.1882
Haennel RG, Quinney HA, Kappagoda CT. Effects of hydraulic circuit training following coronary artery bypass surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2022 Sept 10];23(2):158-65. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2017011
Forestieri P, Guizilini S, Peres M, Bublitz C, Bolzan DW, Rocco IS, et al. A cycle ergometer exercise program improves exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle function in hospitalized patients awaiting heart transplantation: a pilot study. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;31(5):389-95. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160078
Trevisan MD, Lopes DGC, Mello RGB, Macagnan FE, Kessler A. Alternative physical therapy protocol using a cycle ergometer during hospital rehabilitation of coronary artery bypass grafting: a clinical trial. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;30(6):615-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20150085
Foestieri P, Guizilini S, Peres M, Bublitz C, Bolzan DW, Rocco IS, et al. A cycle ergometer exercise program improves exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle function in hospitalized patients awaiting heart transplantation: a pilot study. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;31(5):389-95. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160078
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Baptista VC, Palhares LC, Oliveira PPM, Filho LMS, Vilarinho KAS, Severino ESBO, et al. Six-minute walk test as a tool for assessing the quality of life in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012;27(2):231-9. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20120039
Winkelmann ER, Silva LG, Silva MMD, Windmoller P, Silva AB. Cardiopulmonary responses of the sit-to-stand test in individuals pre and post-heart surgery: cross section. Journals Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health. 2021;11(4):730-37. doi: 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v11i4.4127
Nenna A, Lusini M, Spadaccio C, Nappi F, Greco SM, Barbato R, et al. Heart rate variability: a new tool to predict complications in adult cardiac surgery. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017;14(11):662-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.11.005
Pageaux B. Perception of effort in Exercise Science: Definition, measurement and perspectives. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(8):885-94. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1188992
World Health Organization & WHO Patient Safety. (2010). Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety version 1.1: final technical report January 2009. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70882
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898
Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0. Cochrane. 2019.
GRADEpro GDT 2015. Grade’s software for summary of findings tables, health technology assessment and guidelines. https://gradepro.org/
GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT, Catley MJ, Moseley AM. Rasch analysis suggested that items from the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist can be summed to create a score. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;101:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.014
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687
Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane; 2014.
Higgins J, Green S (e). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
DoenstT, Bargenda S, Kirov H, Moschovas A, Tkebuchava S, Safarov R, et al. Cardiac Surgery 2019 Reviewed. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(5):363-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713648
Borges DL, Silva MG, Silva LN, Fortes JV, Costa ET, Assunção RP, et al. Effects of aerobic exercise applied early after coronary artery bypass grafting on pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and functional capacity: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(9):946-51. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0614
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 João Paulo Rodrigues Pacheco, Eduardo Pinheiro Leão, Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto, Adilson Mendes, Larissa de Magalhães Doebeli Matias, Juliana Ribeiro Fonseca Franco de Macedo, Adriana Lunardi, Elinaldo da Conceição dos Santos, Ioan Cosmin Boca
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
