Use of ratings of perceived exertion in national journals of physical activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33233/rbfe.v18i1.2799Keywords:
ratings of perceived exertion; perceptual scales; state of artAbstract
This study aimed to understand the current scenario of using ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in national journals of Physical Education. A census about using RPE scales in articles published in journals with high Qualis/Capes qualification was carried out in order to identify how the topic has been approached. Ninety four of 113 articles found fit the inclusion criteria to compose the sample, 85 of which published from 2008 on. Despite the high number of studies, the category with the highest number of articles was the one that uses RPE only as a secondary mean to control exercise. It leads us to conclude that is necessary to do more studies regarding this theme to spread the value of this accessible and relevant tool to Physical Education.
References
Ferreira GA, Bertuzzi R, Lima-Silva AE, Malfatti C, De-Oliveira FR, Osiecki R. Identification of training status differences using perceived exertion threshold. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016;41(4):456-9. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0478
Marques NK. "Estado da arte" das escalas de percepção subjetiva de esforço. Rev Bras Prescrição Fisiol Exerc 2013;7(39):293-308.
Charlot B. A pesquisa educacional entre conhecimentos, políticas e práticas: especificidades e desafios de uma área de saber. Rev Bras Educ 2006;11(2007):1-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782006000100002
Ferreira NSA. As pesquisas denominadas "estado da arte." Educ Soc 2002;23(79):257–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-73302002000300013
Fazenda ICA. Didática e Interdisciplinaridade. 12a ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2008. 192 p.
Borg Gav. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1982;14(5):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1989;11(3):304–17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.3.304
Pfeiffer KA, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malina RM. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34(12):2057-61.
Borg E, Kaijser L. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests. Scand J Med Sci Sport 2006;16(1):57-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00448.x
Eston RG. Use of ratings of perceived exertion for predicting maximal work rate and prescribing exercise intensity in patients taking atenolol. Br J Sports Med 1997;31(2):114-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.31.2.114
Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S et al. A New approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001;15(1):109-15.
Nakamura FY, Moreira A, Aoki MS. Monitoramento da carga de treinamento: a percepção subjetiva do esforço da sessão é um método confiável? Rev Educ Física/UEM 2010;21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v21i1.6713
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2006.
Ferreira D, Gardinal B, Pinto GMC, Pedroso B. Análise da produção científica sobre dança no decênio 2005-2014: um levantamento a partir da base de dados Scielo Brasil. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales 2016;(3).
Ontañón T, Duprat R, Bortoleto MA. Educação física e atividades circenses: "O estado da arte." Movimento 2012;18(2):149–68. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.22960
Betti M, Ferraz OL, Dantas LEPBT. Educação física escolar: estado da arte e direções futuras. Rev Bras Educ Física Esporte 2011;25(Spec):105-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-55092011000500011
Gasparotto S, Santos SLC. Produção científica nacional sobre o ensino de lutas no ambiente escolar: estado da arte. Conex Rev Fac Educ Física da UNICAMP 2013;11:46-58. https://doi.org/10.20396/conex.v11i4.8637594
Filho AL, Silva AM, Nascimento JV, Mascarenhas F. Modus operandi da produção científica da educação física: Uma análise das revistas e suas veiculações. Rev Educ Fis 2012;23(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.4025/reveducfis.v23i1.12551
Abbiss CR, Peiffer JJ, Meeusen R, Skorski S. Role of ratings of perceived exertion during self-paced exercise: what are we actually measuring? Sport Med 2015;45(9):1235-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5
Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TK, Housh TJ, Kibler WB, Kraemer WJ et al. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2009;41(3):687-708.
Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(2):333-41.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Luara Loren Arcenio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine; Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
