Estudo comparativo entre duas escalas funcionais para pacientes com esclerose múltipla
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v9i2.1623Abstract
Introdução: A esclerose múltipla (EM) é uma doença neurológica progressiva que tipicamente resulta em limitação funcional. Objetivo: Comparar escalas funcionais em pacientes com EM. Materiais e métodos: Foi realizado um estudo observacional no Hospital da Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, em 71 pacientes. Foram coletadas as variáveis demográficas, avaliação funcional (Índice de Barthel – IB e Escala do Estado de Incapacidade - EEI); qualidade de vida; incapacidade; marcha; fadiga. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 40 anos, com duração média de doença de 8 anos. Foi observada uma maior correlação entre o EEI e as outras variáveis. A magnitude das correlações do EEI foi superior às do IB. A EEI foi a única escala que apresentou correlação com fadiga e se correlacionou mais com a qualidade de vida. Conclusões: A EEI se mostrou superior ao IB por se correlacionar com os principais comprometimentos dos pacientes, sendo mais completa e conter itens específicos da EM.
Palavras-chave: esclerose múltipla, incapacidade, fisioterapia.
References
Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guideline for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13(3):227-33.
LaBan MM, Martin T, Pechur J, Sarnacki S. Physical and occupational therapy in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 1998;9(3):603-14.
Shumway-Cook A, Marjorie HW. Controle motor: teorias e aplicações práticas. 1a ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2003: 379-425.
Tilbery CP. Esclerose Múltipla no Brasil: aspectos clÃnicos e terapêuticos. Série neurologia: diagnóstico e tratamento. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2005: p.71-83.
van der Putten JJFM, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measure the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of measuring change in disability after inpatient. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66(4):480-84.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-5.
Kurtzke JF. Disability rating scales in multiple sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1984;436:347-60.
Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22(16):702-15.
Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55(9):922-8.
Sangha H, Lipson D, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal S, Pohani G, Teasell RW. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28(2):135-9.
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50(1):121-7.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual e Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center; 2005.
Miller DM, Rudick RA, Cutter G, Baier M, Fischer JS. Clinical significance of the multiple sclerosis functional composite: relationship to patient-reported quality of life. Arch Neurol 2000;57:1319-24.
Delgado-MendilÃvar JM, Cadenas-Diaz JC, Fernandez-Torrico JM, Navarro-Mascarell G, Izquierdo G. Estudio de la calidad de vida en la esclerosis múltiple. Rev Neurol 2005;41(5):257-62.
Miller A, Dishon S. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: The impact of disability, gender and employment status. Qual of Life Res 2006;15: 259-271.
Merkelbach S, Sittinger H, Koenig J. Is there a differential impact of fatigue and physical disability on quality of life in multiple sclerosis? J Nerv Ment Dis 2002; 190:388-93.
Hemmett L, Holmes J, Barnes M, Russel N. What drives quality of life in multiple sclerosis. QJM 2004;97:671-76.
Pittion-Vouyovitch S, Debouverie M, Guillemin F, Vandenberghe N, Anxionnat R, Vespignani H. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis is related to disability, depression and quality of life. J. Neurol Sci 2006;243:39-45.
Rasova K, Ktasensky J, Havrdova E, Obenberger J, Seidel Z, Dolezal O, Rexova P, Zalisova M. Is it possible to actively and purposely make use of plasticity and adaptability in the neurorehabilitation treatment of multiple sclerosis patients? A pilot project. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:170-181.
Einarssom U, Gottberg K, Fredrikson S, Bergendal G, von Koch L, Holmqvist LW. Multiple Sclerosis in Stockholm country. A pilot study exploring the feasibility of assessment of impairment, disability and handicap by home visits. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:294-303.
LaRocca NG, Scheinberg LC, Slater RJ, Giesser B, Smith CR, Traugott U, et al. Field testing of a minimal record of disability in multiple sclerosis: the United States and Canada. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1984;101:126-38.
Solari A, Amato MP, Bergamaschi R, Logroscino G, Citterio A, Bochicchio D, et al. Accuracy of self-assessment of the minimal record of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;87(1):43-6.
Roullet E, Coste M, Basque V, Moccati D, Beneton C, Millet MF, Marteau R. The minimal record of disability and multiple sclerosis. Results of the evaluation of 200 patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1988;144(12):805-16.
Hutchinson J, Hutchinson M. The Functional Limitations Profile may be a valid, reliable and sensitive measure of disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 1995; 242(10):650-7.
Provinciali L, Ceravolo MG, Bartolini M, Loqullo F, Danni M. A multidimensional assessment of multiple sclerosis: relationship between disability domains. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;100(3):156-62.
Freeman JA, Hobart JC, Playford ED, Undy B, Thompson AJ. Evaluating neurorehabilitation: lessons from routine data collection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76(5):723-8.
Cano SJ, O`Connor RJ, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: Do more response options help? Neurology 2006; 67:2056-59.
Cattaneo D, Regola A, Meotti M. Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(12):789-95.
Pietro-Gonzalez JM. Scales for functional assessment in multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurol 2000;30(12):1246-52.
Béthoux F. Évaluation et sclérose en plaques. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 2005;48:369-75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors are authorized for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
