The impact of app use on adherence and persistence to the treatment of female urinary incontinence: randomized longitudinal study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v23i2.4835

Keywords:

urinary incontinence; pelvic floor; treatment adherence and compliance; health education; low cost technology

Abstract

Aims: To analyze the adherence of incontinent women to smartphone-assisted pelvic physical therapy compared to traditional approaches. Methods: Longitudinal randomized controlled study of 128 women: G1 application-assisted face-to-face physical therapy; G2 face-to-face physical therapy and printed exercise sheet; G3 application only and G4 printed sheet only. There were 12 face-to-face group physical therapy sessions once a week for 3 months. Results: 77 (60.2%) adhered to the treatment and 51 (39.8%) did not. Adherents had an average of 48.3 years, against 44.5 for non-adherents (p = 0.015). There was less adherence to synchronous methodologies: G1, 19 (50%), G2, 21 (28.8%), when compared to asynchronous: G3, 3 (13.6%), and in G4, 8 (32%) (p = 0.025). Smokers (71.4%) and alcohol users (53.85%) did not adhere (p = 0.002 and p = 0.016 respectively). 50 women had SUI, 67 MUI and 11 UUI, not correlated with adherence (p = 0.06). None of non-adherent women had an income above 6 base salaries. Conclusion: Adherence to pelvic floor muscle training is higher when physical therapy is combined with a mobile app. Smoking, alcohol consumption and income category negatively impact adherence.

Author Biographies

Claudia Veloso Mueller, Federal University of Paraná

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil

Maura Regina Seleme, Faculdade Inspirar

Faculdade Inspirar, Curitiba, PR, Abafi-Holland, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Gustavo Fernando Sutter Latorre, Faculdade Inspirar

Faculdade Inspirar, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil

Monique Schreiner, Federal University of Paraná

Bióloga (CRBio 108678/07-D), Universidade Federal do Paraná,Curitiba, PR, Brasil

Rogério de Fraga, Federal University of Paraná

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil

References

Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:213-40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20870

Milsom I, Coyne KS, Nicholson S, Kvasz M, Chen C-I, Wein AJ. Global prevalence and economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014;65:79-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.031

Li T, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Ding X, Yu Z-J, Lu S. Prevalence and risk factors of stress urinary incontinence among perimenopausal women and its influence on daily life in women with sexual desire problem. Curr Med Sci 2019;39:615-21. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2082-7

Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009;11:163-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124823

Ayeleke RO, Hay-Smith EJC, Omar MI. Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010551.pub3

Bo K, Berghmans B, Morkved S, Van Kampen M. Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor. London: Elsevier; 2007. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-10146-5.X5001-1

Rodrigues PPC, Bary B, Regina SM, Cássio R, Pereira SB. Guia de Prática Clínica da Associação Brasileira de disioterapia Pélvica. In: Palma PCR, ed. Urofisioterapia: aplicações clínicas e técnicas fisioterapêuticas nas disfunções miccionais e do assoalho pélvico. 2nd edition. São Paulo: AB; 2014. p.574.

Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4

Guerra TEC, Rossato C, Nunes EFC. Role of physical therapy in the treatment of urinary incontinence of effort. Femina [Internet] 2014 [cited 2022 March 9];42:251-4. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/en/lil-749144

Latorre GFS, Fraga R, Seleme MR, Mueller CV, Berghmans B. An ideal e-health system for pelvic floor muscle training adherence: Systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 2019;38:63-80. doi: 10.1002/nau.23835

McClurg D, Frawley H, Hay-Smith J, Dean S, Chen S-Y, Chiarelli P, et al. Scoping review of adherence promotion theories in pelvic floor muscle training - 2011 ics state-of-the-science seminar research paper i of iv. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:606-14. doi: 10.1002/nau.22769

Gusmão JL, Mion-Jr D. Adesão ao tratamento – conceitos. Rev Bras Hipertens [Internet] 2006 [cited 2022 March 9];13:23-5. Available from: http://www.deciomion.com.br/medicos/artigos/artigos_decio/Adesao_ao_tratamento_www-deciomion-com-br.pdf

WHO. Report of the third global survey on eHealth Global Observatory for eHealth Global diffusion of eHealth: Making universal health coverage achievable. World Heal Organ. 2016. [Internet]. [cited 2022 March 9]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders

WHO. Classification of digital health interventions v1.0: a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health (No. WHO/RHR/19.06). 2018;1–20 [Internet] [cited 2022 March 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/mhealth/classification-digital-health-interventions/en/

Kjos AL, Vaughan AG, Bhargava A. Impact of a mobile app on medication adherence and adherence-related beliefs in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc 2019;59:S44-S51.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.12.012

Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242

Berghmans B. Pelvic floor muscle training: what is important? A mini-review. Obstet Gynecol Int J 2017;6. doi: 10.15406/ogij.2017.06.00214

Jiang S, Xiang J, Gao X, Guo K, Liu B. The comparison of telerehabilitation and face-to-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:257-62. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686748

Bruna-Barranco I, Lué A, Gargallo-Puyuelo CJ, Arroyo MT, Alfambra E, Montero J, et al. Young age and tobacco use are predictors of lower medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;31:948-53. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001436

Hale WJ, Perrotte JK, Baumann MR, Garza RT. Low self-esteem and positive beliefs about smoking: A destructive combination for male college students. Addict Behav 2015;46:94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.03.007

Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1248:107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x

Pereira CF, Vargas D de. Profile of women who carried out smoking cessation treatment: a systematic review. Rev Saúde Pública 2015;49. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005783

Vasconcelos HG, Silva Vaz SH, Rodrigues FOS, Oliveira DLV, Prado LFR, Saliba PS. Associação entre a prevalência do tabagismo e o perfil socioeconômico de estudantes do ensino médio em uma Cidade do Estado de Minas Gerais. Brazilian J Heal Rev 2020;3:9667-79. doi: 10.34119/bjhrv3n4-201

Coutinho LSB, Tomasi E. Déficit de autocuidado em idosos: características, fatores associados e recomendações às equipes de Estratégia Saúde da Família. Interface - Comun Saúde, Educ 2020;24 suppl 1. doi: 10.1590/interface.190578

Carneiro TAR. Faixas Salariais x Classe Social - Qual a sua classe social? 2020. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 30]. Available from: https://thiagorodrigo.com.br/artigo/faixas-salariais-classe-social-abep-ibge/

Pace AE, Nunes PD, Ochoa-Vigo K. O conhecimento dos familiares acerca da problemática do portador de diabetes mellitus. Rev Latinam Enferm 2003;11:312-9. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692003000300008

Neri M, Soares W. Desigualdade social e saúde no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2002;18 suppl:S77–87. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2002000700009

Tavares NUL, Bertoldi AD, Mengue SS, Arrais PSD, Luiza VL, Oliveira MA, et al. Factors associated with low adherence to medicine treatment for chronic diseases in Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública 2016;50(suppl2). doi: 10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006150

Machado CA. Adesão ao tratamento – Tema cada vez mais atual. Rev Bras Hipertens [Internet] 2008[cited 2022 March 9];15:220-1. Available from: http://departamentos.cardiol.br/dha/revista/15-4/11-comunicacao-breve%20.pdf

Published

2022-05-19