The use of participation assessment and contextual factors for extended analysis of child neurodevelopment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v24i6.5497Keywords:
Premature, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Child developmentAbstract
Objective: To investigate the use of participation and contextual factors assessment instruments to enable expanded analysis of neurodevelopment in at-risk children. Methods: Cross-sectional study, composed of preterm children aged between three and 42 months. Those with congenital malformations, genetic syndromes and exposure to congenital infections were excluded. The instruments Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), Denver Test II, Child Engagement in Daily Life (CEDL), Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD) and a structured questionnaire developed by the researchers were used for assessment. Results: Sample of 29 children with higher prevalence of alterations in fine (34.5%) and gross (24.1%) motor domains; regarding participation, 58.6% almost never played outdoors with other children and 75.9% almost never went on entertainment outings, regarding contextual factors, low provision of fine (46.4%) and gross (57.1%) motor skills materials in homes. Conclusion: Children with neurodevelopment classified as questionable had changes in the domains of participation and contextual factors, indicating the importance of a more detailed assessment. The use of instruments to analyze these domains contributed to a better understanding of neurodevelopment.
References
Bhutta ZA, Guerrant RL, Nelson CA. Neurodevelopment, nutrition, and inflammation: the evolving global child health landscape. Pediatrics. 2017;139(1):S12-S22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2828D
Di Renzo GC, Tosto V, Giardina I. The biological basis and prevention of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;52:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.022
Sansavini A, Guarini A, Caselli MC. Preterm birth: neuropsychological profiles and atypical developmental pathways. Dev Disabil Res Ver. 2013;17(2):102-13. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.1105
Yanuarti HP, Rusmil K, Effendi SH. Environment as a risk factor in delayed development in premature, low-birthweight and mild asphyxia children. Pediatr Int. 2014;56(5):720-5. doi: 10.1111/ped.12333
Burnett AC, Cheong JLY, Doyle LW. Biological and Social Influences on the Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants. Clin Perinatol. 2018;45(3):485-500. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.05.005.
Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, et al. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. The Lancet. 2007;369(9):60-70. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60032-4
Jansen L, Peeters-Scholte CMPCD, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, van Klink JMM, Rijken M, van Egmond-van Dam JC, Vermeiren RRJM, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of children born preterm: neurodevelopment from 2 to 10 years of age. Front Pediatr [Internet]. 2021;9:674221. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.674221
Brachio SS, Farkouh-Karoleski C, Abreu A, Zygmunt A, Purugganan O, Garey D. Improving neonatal follow-up: a quality improvement study analyzing in-hospital interventions and long-term show rates. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020;5(6):e363. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000363
OMS. CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde [Centro Colaborador da Organização Mundial da Saúde para a Família de Classificações Internacionais, org.; coordenação da tradução Cassia Maria Buchalla [Internet]. 1st ed. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo; 2008 [citado 2023 maio 28]. 328 p. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9788531407840_por.pdf;sequence=11
Lugli L, Pugliese M, Plessi C, Berardi A, Guidotti I, Ancora G, et al. Neuroprem: The Neuro-developmental outcome of very low birth weight infants in an Italian region. Ital J Pediatr [Internet]. 2020;46(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0787-7
Frankenburg W, Dodds J, Archer P, Bresnick B, Maschka P, Edelman N, et al. Denver II Teste de Triagem do Desenvolvimento - Manual Técnico: adaptação brasileira por Ana Lhonch Sabatés. 1st ed. São Paulo: Hogrefe; 2018. 53 p.
Lopez Boo F, Cubides Mateus M, Llonch Sabatés A. Initial psychometric properties of the Denver II in a sample from Northeast Brazil. Infant Behav Dev. 2020;58:101391. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101391
Valentini NC, Saccani R. Brazilian validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Phys Ther. 2012;92(3):440-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110036
Valentini NC, Saccani R. Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta: Validação para uma população gaúcha. Rev Paul Pediatr [Internet]. 2011;29(2):231–8. doi:10.1590/S0103-05822011000200015
Caçola PM, Gabbard C, Montebelo MI, Santos DC. Further Development and Validation of the Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale (AHEMD-IS). Phys Ther. 2015;95(6):901-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140011
Caçola PM, Gabbard C, Montebelo MI, Santos DC. The new affordances in the home environment for motor development - infant scale (AHEMD-IS): Versions in English and Portuguese languages. Braz J Phys Ther. 2015;19(6):507-25.doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0112
Rodrigues LP, Saraiva L, Gabbard C. Rodrigues LP, Saraiva L, Gabbard C. Development and construct validation of an inventory for assessing the home environment for motor development. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76(2):140-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599276
Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, McCoy SW, Bartlett DJ, Wood A, Chang HJ, et al. Child Engagement in Daily Life: a measure of participation for young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(21):1804-16. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.882417
Hee Chung E, Chou J, Brown KA. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants: a recent literature review. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(1):S3-S8. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.09.10
Fuentefria RDN, Silveira RC, Procianoy RS. Motor development of preterm infants assessed by the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: systematic review article. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(4):328-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.03.003
Freitas TC, Gabbard C, Caçola P, Montebelo MI, Santos DC. Family socioeconomic status and the provision of motor affordances in the home. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013; 17(4):319-27. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552013005000096
Pereira L, Guedes SC, Morais RL, Nobre JN, Santos JN. Recursos ambientais, tipos de brinquedos e práticas familiares que potencializam o desenvolvimento cognitivo infantil. CoDAS. 2021;33(2):e20190128. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019128
Defilipo EC, Magalhães ED, Máltaro CM, Oliveira LC, Neimerck AL, Brugiolo AS. Oportunidades do ambiente domiciliar e desenvolvimento motor de lactentes no primeiro ano. Fisioter Mov. 2021;34,e34108. doi: 10.1590/fm.2021.34108
Pires FF. O Programa Bolsa Família a partir das crianças beneficiadas: uma abordagem das moralidades engendradas pela condicionalidade escolar. 1st ed. Salvador: EDUFBA; 2016;91-108 p. doi: 10.7476/9788523218669.0006
Silva DI, Veríssimo M, Mazza V. Vulnerabilidade no desenvolvimento infantil: influência das políticas públicas e programas de saúde. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2015;25(1),11-18. doi: 10.7322/jhgd.96760
Msall ME, Sobotka AS, Dmowska A, Hogan D, Sullivan M. Life Course Health Development Outcomes After Prematurity: Developing a Community, Clinical, and Translational Research Agenda to Optimize Health, Behavior, and Functioning. 2017. In: Halfon N, Forrest CB, Lerner RM, et al., editors. Handbook of Life Course Health Development [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_14
Sudry T, Zimmerman DR, Yardeni H, Joseph A, Baruch R, Grotto I, et al. Standardization of a Developmental Milestone Scale Using Data From Children in Israel. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(3):e222184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2184
World Health Organization. Improving early childhood development: WHO guideline. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
Fiocruz. Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira. COVID-19 e Saúde da Criança e do Adolescente. 2020. Disponível em: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/atencaocrianca/covid-19-saude-crianca-e-adolescente
Nobre JN, Santos JN, Santos LR, Guedes SB, Pereira L, Costa JM, et al. Fatores determinantes no tempo de tela de crianças na primeira infância. Cien Saude Colet. 2019;26(3),1127-36. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021263.00602019
Bento G, Dias G. The importance of outdoor play for young children's healthy development. Porto Biomed J. 2017;2(5):157-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.03.003
Zanotto L, Sommerhalder A, Pentini AA. The reorganization of the family life with children in a pandemic by COVID-19 in Brazil [Internet]. SciELO Preprints. 2021. doi: 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2776
Mélo TR, Araujo LB, Novakoski KR, Israel VL. Sistematização de instrumentos de avaliação para os dois primeiros anos de vida de bebês típicos ou em risco conforme o modelo da CIF. Fisioter Pesqui. 2019;26(4):380-93. doi:10.1590/1809-2950/18026126042019
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Camila Santos Barros, Maria Fernanda Vieira, Carla Martins Trevisan Ribeiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors are authorized for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
