Acute effect of the use of Russian and Aussie currents on the muscular strength of fist and finger flexors

Authors

  • Marina Rufino Mariano UFPI
  • Ivy Veras de Sousa UFPI
  • Priscila Thais Araújo dos Santos UFPI
  • Paulo Roberto Milanez Oliveira Junior UFPI
  • Francisco Eliezer Xavier Magalhães UFPI
  • Dionis de Castro Dutra Machado UFPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v21i5.2691

Keywords:

Physiotherapy, electro-stimulation, muscle strength

Abstract

Introduction: The motor and sensorial changes of the decrease the strength of the muscles that make up this segment and can affect the quality of life of the individual. In the field of Physical Therapy, the decrease of muscle strength is often treated with the use of excitomotor currents. Among those commonly used, the Russian and Aussie currents stand out because they are of medium frequency and promote comfortable sensory stimulation. Objective: To identify the acute effects of the use of Aussie and Russian chains on the muscular strength of wrist and finger flexors. Methods: An experimental study was carried out, in which the palmar grip strength was evaluated before and after the application of excitomotor currents (Aussie and Russian). The volunteers were divided into two groups, GR, the Russian current therapy was taken, and GA, who received the therapy using the Aussie current. The stimulation using the Russian current was performed with carrier frequency of 2500 Hz with burst of 10 ms, stimulation frequency of 50 Hz, time On 5 seconds and time Off 15 seconds and modulation of 20%. The Aussie current stimulation was performed with a frequency of 1000 Hz with a burst of 2 ms, modulation frequency at 50 Hz, time On in 5 seconds, time Off 15 seconds, ramps up and down fixed in 2 seconds. In both stimulations, the intensity of the current was adjusted according to the tolerance of the participant, seeking to trigger visible muscle contraction, and the total time of application was 10 minutes. Results: Changes in goniometry and dynamometry were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA. When analyzing the main effects of the goniometry data, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups [F (2,114) = 2,662; p = 0.074] and between the moments [F (1.114) = 2.893; p = 0.092]. The dynamometry data also did not present main effect for the moments [F (1,114) = 0.392; p = 0.533]. However, a major effect was observed for groups with [F (2,114) = 3.119; p = 0.048]. Thus, the present study did not find statistically significant differences in palmar grip strength gain as a result of a single application of the currents studied. Conclusion: It is suggested to perform additional studies using electrical stimulation, seeking to establish parameters more indicated to promote greater muscle strength gains and therapeutic benefits.

Author Biographies

Marina Rufino Mariano, UFPI

Ft., Universidade Federal do Piauí­ (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brasil

Ivy Veras de Sousa, UFPI

Ft., Universidade Federal do Piauí­ (UFPI), teresina, PI, Brasil

Priscila Thais Araújo dos Santos, UFPI

Ft., Universidade Federal do Piauí­ (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brasil

Paulo Roberto Milanez Oliveira Junior, UFPI

Ft., Universidade Federal do Piauí­ (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brasil

Francisco Eliezer Xavier Magalhães, UFPI

Ft., D.Sc.,  Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Piauí­ (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brasil

Dionis de Castro Dutra Machado, UFPI

Professora adjunta do departamento de Educação Fí­sica do CCS da Universidade Federal do Piauí­  (UFPI), Teresina, PI, Brasil

References

Dias JA, Ovando AC, Külkamp W, Borges Junior NG. Força de preensão palmar: métodos de avaliação e fatores que influenciam a medida. Rev Bras Cineantropometria Desempenho Hum 2010;12(3):209-16.

Amaral JF, Mancini M, Novo Júnior JM. Comparison of three hand dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of the measurements. Rev Bras Fisioter 2012;16(3):216-24. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012000300007

Barbour KE, Lui LY, McCulloch CE, Ensrud KE, Cawthon PM, Yaffe K et al. Trajectories of lower extremity physical performance: effects on fractures and mortality in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016;71(12):1609-15. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw071

Reidel LT, Cecchele B, Sachetti A, Calegari L. Efeitos da eletroestimulação neuromuscular de quadríceps sobre a funcionalidade de idosos frágeis e pré-frágeis hospitalizados: ensaio clí­nico randomizado. Fisioter Pesqui 2020;27(2):126-32. doi: 10.1590/1809-2950/18046327022020

Cameron MH. Agentes Fí­sicos na Reabilitação, da pesquisa a prática. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2009.

Zheng Y, Hu X. Reduced muscle fatigue using kilohertz-frequency subthreshold stimulation of the proximal nerve. J Neural Eng 2018; 15(6):066010. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aadecc

Ramalingam AT, Mayuri AP, Vidhi HM, Bhumika ST, Hardik BP. Difference in sensory, motor and pain threshold for medium frequency electrical stimuli in different pain conditions-A pilot study. J Integr Health Sci 2016;4(2):7-13. doi: 10.4103/2347-6486.240206

Vaz MA, Frasson VB. Low-frequency pulsed current versus kilohertz-frequency alternating current: a scoping literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99(4):792-805. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.001

Ward AR, Chuen WL. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90(9):1619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.022

Lee DJ, Shim JH, Yoon SI, Park SJ. Effect of convergence-based Russian current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at quadríceps muscler on pain, strength, and performance in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society 2017;8(1):77-87. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2017-0058

Silva ÉPR, Silva VR, Bernardes AS, Matuzawa FM, Liebano RE. Study protocol of hypoalgesic effects of low frequency and burst-modulated alternating currents on healthy individuals. Pain Management 2018;8(2):71-7. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2017-0058

Fess EE. Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd ed. American Society of Hand Therapists. Garner; 1992.

Neumann S, Kwisda S, Krettek C, Gaulke R. Comparison of the grip strength using the martin-vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: establishment of normal values. In vivo 2017;31(5):917-24. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11147

Delitto A, Strube MJ, Shulman AD, Minor SD. A study of discomfort with electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 2013;72(6):410-21. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.6.410

Domingues PW, Moura CT, Onetta RC, Zinezi G, Buzzanello MR, Bertolini GRF. Efeitos da EENM associada í contração voluntária sobre a força de preensão palmar. Fisioter Mov 2009;22(1):19-25.

Pires KF, Grosso DB. Correlação entre a fadiga subjetiva e objetiva na eletroestimulação neuromuscular. Fisioter Bras 2002;3(4):216-22. doi: 10.33233/fb.v3i4.2962

Gorgey AS, Black CD, Elder CP, Dudley GA. Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy 2009;39(9):684-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3045

Natsume T, Ozaki H, Kakigi R, Kobayashi H, Naito H. Effects of training intensity in electromyostimulation on human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018;118(7):1339-47. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3866-3

Augusto DDA, Ventura PP, Nogueira JFS, Brasileiro JS. Efeito imediato da estimulação elétrica neuromuscular seletiva na atividade eletromiográfica do músculo vasto medial oblíquo. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2008;10(2):155-60.

Low J, Reed A. Eletroterapia explicada: princí­pios e práticas. 3. ed. São Paulo: Manole; 2001.

Neyroud D, Gonzalez M, Mueller S, Agostino D, Grosprêtre S, Maffiuletti NA et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to wide-pulse high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019;119(5):1105-16. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04100-1

Silva BC, Coracini CA, Branco CL, Michelon MD, Bertolini GRF. Corrente Aussie em estudantes com cervicalgia crônica: um ensaio clí­nico randomizado. Br JP 2018;1(3):202-6. doi: 10.5935/2595-0118.20180040

Freitas TP. Efeitos da eletroestimulação neuromuscular e exercício resistido sobre a atividade elétrica e força do bíceps braquial. Fisioter Bras 2016;13(3):205-10. doi: 10.33233/fb.v13i3.539

Guirro R, Nunes VC, Davini R. Comparação dos efeitos de dois protocolos de estimulação elétrica neuromuscular sobre a força muscular isométrica do quadríceps. Fisioter Pesqui 2000;7(1-2):10-15. doi: 10.1590/fpusp.v7i1-2.78949

Oliveira F, Maiki T, Calonego CA, Nascimento NH, Rebelatto JR. Estimulação elétrica neuromuscular e exercí­cios com movimentos na diagonal para ganho de força em bí­ceps e tríceps braquial. Rev Bras Fisioter 2002;6(3):159-65.

Published

2020-11-19